首页> 外文OA文献 >Increasing adherence to obstructive sleep apnea treatment with a group social cognitive therapy treatment intervention: a randomized trial.
【2h】

Increasing adherence to obstructive sleep apnea treatment with a group social cognitive therapy treatment intervention: a randomized trial.

机译:一组社会认知疗法治疗干预措施增加对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停治疗的依从性:一项随机试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a social cognitive therapy (SCT) intervention increases continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use compared to equivalent social interaction (SI) time. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) referred for CPAP therapy. INTERVENTION: Participants received a 30-min group education session regarding OSA and CPAP. Groups of three to four participants were then randomly assigned to an SCT session or social interaction. MEASUREMENTS: CPAP usage was assessed at 7 nights, then 1, 3, and 6 months. The two primary outcomes were adherence, usage ≥ 4 h per night at 6 months, and uptake of CPAP. Questionnaires were given pretreatment and posttreatment. RESULTS: Two hundred six individuals were randomized to SI (n = 97) or SCT (n = 109). CPAP uptake was not different between groups (82% in SI, 88% in SCT groups, P = 0.35). There were no differences between groups in adherence: 63-66% at 1 week, and at 6 months 55-47% (P = 0.36). Higher pretreatment apnea-hypopnea index, higher baseline self-efficacy, and use of CPAP (≥ 4 h) at 1 week were independent predictors of CPAP adherence at 6 months. CPAP adherence increased by a factor of 1.8 (odds ratio = 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.0) for every one-unit increase in self-efficacy. There was no difference between groups postintervention in self-efficacy scores, sleepiness, mood, or sleep quality. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, a single SCT application did not increase adherence when compared with SI time. Although self-efficacy scores prior to CPAP predicted adherence, self-efficacy was not increased by the interventions. Increasing intensity and understanding of SCT interventions may be needed to improve CPAP adherence. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12607000424404.
机译:目的:研究与相对应的社会互动(SI)时间相比,社会认知疗法(SCT)干预是否增加持续使用气道正压通气(CPAP)。参与者:患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的患者被推荐接受CPAP治疗。干预:参加者接受了有关OSA和CPAP的30分钟的小组教育。然后将三到四个参与者组成的小组随机分配到SCT会话或社交互动中。测量:在7晚,然后1、3和6个月评估CPAP使用情况。两个主要结局是坚持治疗,6个月每晚使用≥4小时和摄取CPAP。对问卷进行了预处理和后处理。结果:206个人被随机分为SI(n = 97)或SCT(n = 109)。两组之间的CPAP摄取无差异(SI组为82%,SCT组为88%,P = 0.35)。两组之间的依从性没有差异:1周时为63-66%,6个月时为55-47%(P = 0.36)。治疗前呼吸暂停低通气指数较高,基线自我效能较高和在1周时使用CPAP(≥4 h)是6个月时CPAP依从性的独立预测因子。自我效能每提高1单位,CPAP依从性就会提高1.8倍(优势比= 1.8,95%置信区间1.1-3.0)。干预后自我效能得分,嗜睡,情绪或睡眠质量在两组之间没有差异。结论:在这项随机试验中,与SI时间相比,单次SCT应用并未增加依从性。尽管CPAP之前的自我效能感评分可预测依从性,但干预措施并未提高自我效能感。可能需要增加强度和对SCT干预措施的了解才能改善CPAP的依从性。临床试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册,ACTRN12607000424404。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号